IMPLICATIONS FOR EQUITY, PRACTICE & IMPLEMENTATION
  Angrist, J. D., & Lavy, V. (1997). Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Unpublished manuscript. Annie F. Casey Foundation. (1997). Kids count data book. Greenwich, CN. August, D., & Hakuta, K.(Eds.). (1997). Improving Schooling for Language-Minority Children. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Barr, R. & Dreeban, R. (1983). How Schools Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Blatchford, P., & Mortimore, P. (1994). The issue of class size for young children in school: What can we learn from research? Oxford Review of Education, 20(4), 411–428. Blattner, B., Hall, K., & Reinhard, R. (1997). Facilities and class size reduction. Sacramento, CA: School Services of California. Butless, Gary (Ed). (1996). Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press. Cahen, L. S., Filby, N., McCutcheon, G., & Kyle, D. W. (1983). Class size and instruction. New York, NY: Longman. California Department of Education. (1997). Special edge. November, 1997. Sacramento, CA: Author. California Education Policy Seminar and California State University (CSU) Institute for Education Reform. (1998). Putting Schools to the Test: California’s NAEP Score and The National Testing Plan. Sacramento, CA: California State University: Sacramento. (http://www.csus.edu/ier/) California Legislative Analyst’s Office. (1997, February 12). Class size reduction Policy Brief. Sacramento, CA: California Legislative Analyst’s Office. (http://www.lao.ca.gov/class_size_297.html) Carlos, L. & Kirst, M. (April 1997). California Curriculum Policy in the 1990’s: We Don’t Have to Be In Front to Lead. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. (http://www.wested.org/cs/pol/print/docs/pol/about.htmpubs/full_text/pb_ft_cacuric.htm ) Coleman, James R. and others. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Government Printing Office. Comer, J. (1984). Home-school relationships as they affect the academic success of children. Urban Society, 16, 323–337. EdSource. (1997) Resource Cards on California Schools 1997-98. Palo Alto, CA: Author. Educational Research Services. (1980). Class size reduction: A critique of recent meta-analyses. Arlington, VA: Author. Finn, J. Class Size: What Does Research Say? Laboratory for Student Success (no. 207). Philadelphia, PA: Mid-Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory. Finn, J. , & Voelkl, K. (1992). Class size: An overview of research (Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology Occasional Paper No. 92–1). Buffalo, NY: State University of New York, Graduate School of Education Publications. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 557–577. Gandara, P. (1997). Review of the research on instruction of limited English proficient students. A Report to the California Legislature. University of California at Davis. (http://www.lmrinet.ucsb.edu/lepexecsum/exesumtoc.htm) Glass, G., Cahen, L., Smith, M., & Filby, N. (1982). School class size: Research and policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Gold, Norman. (1997). LEP students and estimated demand, supply and shortage of bilingual teachers, 1985-1997. California Department of Education, Office of Complaints Management and Bilingual Compliance Unit. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). The evidence on class size (Working Paper No. 10). W. University of Rochester: Allen Walls Institute of Political Economy. Illig, D. (1996). Reducing class size: A review of the literature and options for consideration. Sacramento, CA: California: California Research Bureau. Illig, D. (1997). Early implementation of the class size reduction initiative. Sacramento, CA: California Research Bureau. Kirst, M. (1997, August 18). Smaller classes aren't a cure-all. The New York Times, p. A-26. Klimes-Dougan, B., Lopez, J., Nelson, P., & Adelman, H. (1992). Two studies of low-income parents’ involvement in schooling. The Urban Review, 24, 185–202. Krueger, A. (1997). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Unpublished paper, Princeton University. Kulik, J.A. (1992). An Analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives, Ability Grouping Research-Based Decision Making Series, No. 9204. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Linn, R. L., & Kiplinger, V. L. (1995). Linking statewide tests to the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Final report to the National Center for Education Statistics. McGiverfin J., Gilman D., & Tillitsk C. (1989). A meta-analysis of the relation between class size and achievement. The Elementary Journal, 90(1), 47–56. McKendrick, P. (1997). "Class Size Reduction: A Survey of Teachers’ Views at Six Elementary Schools." A Paper for Superintendent Carl Cohn, Long Beach Unified School District, CA. McRobbie, J. (1997, February). Class Size Reduction: A One-Year Status Check. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 6-32. McRobbie, J. (1996). Focus on California's class-size reduction: Smaller classes aim to launch early literacy. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. Miller, K. E., Nelson, J. E., & Naifeh, M. (December 1995). Cross State Data Compendium for the NAEP 1994 Grade Four Reading Assessment. 95-157. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics. Mosteller, F. (1995, Summer/Fall). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. Future of Children, 5(2), 113–127. Mosteller, F., Light, R. J., & Sachs, J. A. (1996). Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 797–828. Muller, C. (1993). Parent involvement and academic achievement: An analysis of family resources available to the child. In B. Schneider & J. Coleman (Eds.), Parents, their children, and schools, pp. 77–113. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press. Murnane, R. & Levy, F. (1996, September 11). Why money sometimes matters. Education Week, 48, 36-37. Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixson, K. K., Campbell, J. R., Gough, P. B., & Beatty, A.S. (1995). Listening to Children Read Aloud. National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Prais, S. J. (1996). Class-size and learning: The Tennessee experiments–what follows? Oxford Review of Education, 22(4), 339–414. Ross, J. (1997). When money matters–a look at school financing. ETS Developments, 42(2). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Rubenstein, D. & Simmonds, A. (1997, January). Preparing teachers for reduced class sizes. Thrust for Educational Leadership, pp. 12-15. Shapson, S., Wright, E., Eason, G., & Fitzgerald, J. (1980). An experimental study of the effects of class size. American Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 141–152. Stevenson, D. & Baker, D. (1987). The family-school relation and the child’s school performance. Child Development, 58, 1348–1357. Tomlinson, T. (1990). Class size and public policy: The plot thickens, Contemporary Education, 62(1), 17–23. Turley, S. & Nakai, K. (1998, February). "Coping with Class Size Reduction in California," Educational Leadership. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Viadero, D. (1998, February 18). Small Classes: Popular, but Still Unproven. EdWeek, p. 1. Wagner, B., & Phillips, D. (1992). Beyond beliefs: Parent and child behaviors and children’s perceived academic competence. Child Development, 63, 1380–1391. Zykowski, J. (1996). Student grouping: A direct link to achievement - A review of CERC's research on class size. Riverside, CA: California Educational Research Cooperative (CERC). |