Roadblocks and Routes: Professional Development in Math in Common Districts
By Rebecca Perry, Stacy Marple, Frances Reade
Description
This report describes several roadblocks that districts participating in the Math in Common (MiC) initiative faced in their early years of Common Core State Standards in Mathematics (CCSS-M) implementation, along with the routes that the districts took around those roadblocks in order to support teacher and student learning.
The Math in Common® (MiC) initiative, funded by the S. D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation, supported a formal network of 10 California school districts as they implemented the CCSS-M across grades K–8. This report is part of a six-part series summarizing key findings from the five-year initiative.
In working to build the understanding of different staff groups about implementing the CCSS-M, MiC districts faced several specific challenges related to how to provide effective and scalable professional development to staff, administrators, and teachers in support of CCSS-M implementation.
Despite the challenges that these roadblocks presented, they also created rich environments for innovation, problem solving, and learning across the MiC community of practice.
This report draws on years of conversation with — and observations of — MiC participants in their districts’ classrooms to offer a set of recommendations about providing effective professional development to support standards implementation. They include:
- Developing an array of professional development strategies for differentiating in-service support to enable useful learning for all teachers
- Examining ways to reallocate or augment funding in order to provide additional time and resources to support teachers’ collaborative work
- Building greater math expertise across the district to support deeper learning for teachers
- Considering how to evaluate the impact of professional development activities to ensure that they are helping staff to implement the district’s mathematics vision
Download this report and the Evaluation Brief to learn more.
Read the entire series of summative evaluation reports and the Executive Summary at WestEd.org/mic-summative-evaluation-reports.
Resource Details
Product Information
Copyright: 2019Format: PDF
Pages: 28
Publisher: WestEd
Available Previews
Related Resources
-
What Accelerates a Community of Practice? Inflection Points That Changed the Course of the Math in Common Initiative
This report describes the trajectory of the Math in Common (MiC) Community of Practice (CoP), including both its missteps and its successes, in the hope that designers or participants of other formal or informal CoPs can leverage the MiC experience and make progress more quickly in their own collaborations.
-
Developing Principals' Instructional Leadership in Math in Common Districts
This report describes the approaches that Math in Common (MiC) districts took toward helping principals take ownership of math instruction and standards implementation at their sites, and profiles three MiC districts that built their principals' instructional leadership over time.
-
Spotlight on Student Achievement: Analyses of Statewide Assessment Data in Math in Common Districts
This report documents the uneven math gains made by Math in Common (MiC) districts, schools, and students, by analyzing the patterns of those gains, which range from outperforming statewide trends to more moderate growth. While progress in student achievement in the MiC districts has been slow, there are some promising signs to share with the field.
Stay Connected
Subscribe to the E-Bulletin and receive regular updates on research, free resources, solutions, and job postings from WestEd.
Your download will be available after you subscribe, or choose no thanks.
